In order for the projects to be fiscally viable and to produce a return on investment, obviously, and also to produce not only a clean energy result in helping the government achieve its objectives for ethanol and so on...it has to be cost effective at the end of the day for the ratepayer. Can you enlighten the committee on your particular product technology, what it's done insofar as tipping fees or collection fees in your agreement? I know there are some secrets, but obviously city council in Edmonton would have dealt with their particular arrangement.
Is there anything that you can tell this committee that we would need to do at the federal government level to make it more self-reliant, to make the technology more self-reliant, on a business model that doesn't require large infusions of cash, not only for start-up but also for maintaining continued operations? Is there something we can do, whether it's a capital cost allowance or anything like that, that will hopefully create an environment where this is less dependent on taxpayers?