From FPAC's perspective, we wouldn't say to let the market decide; what we would say is to let economics prevail.
A perfect example of that is that if you had a fund dedicated to biofuel generation and you allowed only biofuel generation, the forest industry would never be able to make it economically viable to generate it. Here is a perfect example: in bio-pathways we looked at five different platforms to produce ethanol from wood. Not a single one of them was economic without huge subsidies, which I don't think we want.
I'm actually not saying to let markets drive it, because markets are quite a bit removed from this decision-making process. It's let the economics.... Let the companies not be hamstrung by force-feeding a particular technology or product that they need to head to. They're strong business people. They can analyze the economics and identify what makes the most sense for their company. If they're forced to squish into a box, it could be problematic for them.