Yes, to some degree it has within the sector.
The references I've made to the U.S. and the U.K. in the written paper were specifically with respect to tax programs that gave a preferential approved tax treatment to energy-efficiency renovations. They are more akin to the one we were pitching for in the written presentation than the subsidy program you're referring to.
Certainly, in making the pitch here, we're members of a coalition. We call it the Building Energy Efficiency Coalition, and it includes manufacturers and installers of the energy-efficient equipment, and includes the commercial building sector, as well as ourselves.
The installers have indicated a preference for tax reform, rather than the incentive programs, because they find that when the incentive programs come out, their work goes up. Toward the end of it their work is high, and then it's cut and their work falls off. So they're on a kind of roller-coaster ride, which isn't good for their employees and isn't good for their businesses. They would prefer the tax improvements, because that provides a more long-term and sustainable advantage.