It's fine to have a feed-in tariff system and it's fine to promote certain types of energy, but if that means you're going to lose capital investments in manufacturing or in certain sectors, you need to reach that balance. You can't just see it from one angle; you have to see it from many angles.
In our sector, in our cost structure, energy's a big part of it. I named a number of policies that are good incentives. There are also other policies that are not that good in terms of providing incentives for manufacturers to become more energy efficient; they're actually a burden for them.
To give you an example, in Alberta some municipalities impose a franchise fee on your utility bill. If your natural gas bill goes up, then your franchise fee at the municipal level goes up. In B.C. they've introduced a carbon tax, which was supposed to be a tax neutral carbon tax.
Tax neutral to me means you would tax a manufacturer for its carbon footprint, but reinvest that money to make that manufacturer more energy efficient, but that's not what they've done. They've taxed manufacturers, and they gave tax credits to rural homeowners and a bunch of other things, so at the end of the day, the carbon tax is just a tax.
All these things need to be thought through thoroughly, because at the end of the day you want to invest in green assets, not just put in a tax or pay a higher tariff just because you want to be seen as a green government having a green policy.