Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to all our guests today. It's tough when we have four witnesses all at once. It doesn't help us narrow down our range of questioning, but what it does do is highlight what's out there and the options that exist.
That leads me to my question. I'm the member of Parliament for the Yukon so, obviously, the territory is a small market. Canada in some sense—it's reflected in a couple of these presentations—is a small market with 33 million people. How do we go about identifying that product?
As Mr. Mabee pointed out, there are really three areas that we're looking at here but, if we're talking about a transportation sector and a home-heating sector, how does an option rise to the top? It would seem to me, from the Yukon perspective, that the cost of developing this is so intensive that you can't give every option to all the consumers in such a small market. If you do that, then... I can't imagine pulling up to a gas station in the Yukon and having a LNG option, a biomass option, a fuel option, a diesel option, and having any one of those actually be viable, because the costs to implement those are so tremendous. That's at the Yukon scale, and it's probably not a much better picture at the national level.
I don't know if you have an exact answer for that, but maybe you have some comments on how we shape that so that the options can exist but, at the same time, we narrow our focus down so that we actually get a product on the market that's going to achieve the goals that you've set. I think that was a good point. We have to define what our metrics are going to be, and maybe that would partly answer it.
We'll start at your end and work our way down.