I like your question better. Absolutely, I think the answer is yes. It will depend, of course, on what that price is, and the market drivers will make sure there is some type of universal application.
For some of the questions I've heard other panellists answer, I didn't like the underlying assumptions that they were based on. I think it's very dangerous to look at the California carbon market and the Quebec carbon market, because both of those markets were designed in a way that they could benefit Quebeckers and Californians. And that's what we have to be looking at when we look at the monetization of carbon. The first person out of the gate is going to design the program that best suits their jurisdiction. I can assure you that the people of Quebec and the people of Ontario have very different interests from the people of Alberta and the people of California when it comes to this type of industry.
I want to be really clear: the government's sectoral approach on reducing anthropogenic gases is a very good approach to take. It has been proven to work in the transportation sector, and it is definitely driving the creation of a renewable fuels industry in this country. The sectoral approach—which looks at each industry individually and the deeds of that individual industry—is the absolute, appropriate way to move forward because it looks at the industries from what they're facing in terms of competition as energy-intensive, trade-exposed sectors. That sectoral approach is the best way to move forward.