Well, first of all, it's a bit of a stretch to suggest that the President of the United States doesn't have the social licence because of Canada. In fact, a strong majority of Americans are in favour of Keystone XL. The governor of every state through which it would go is in favour, a majority of the senators, and a majority of the House.
But that is not to say we do not have a responsibility, which we fully accept, to do what is appropriate in terms of addressing this very serious issue. We have talked, when we've gone down to the United States, and I was recently in Chicago and Houston and am going to be in New York and Washington next week again, about how our objectives are aligned with those of the United States in terms of reducing our greenhouse gas emissions by 17% from 2005 by 2020, and we're halfway there. We've talked about how our fuel standards for automobiles and trucks are identical to those of the U.S. and how, in some respects, we're ahead of the world. So we're doing a lot.
I can go through some of these issues. What we're doing is financing initiatives that work, that are efficient, that are effective, but also, we're looking at ways to be protective of the taxpayers' hard-earned dollars, and when they're less effective or when they have completed their mission, then we decide accordingly.