There's another dimension to the economics of upgrading, in the western Canada context, in the sense that again, the outlet for the production there is constrained to that U.S. Midwest market, which has been oversaturated in part with our own supply. When Suncor calculates the economics of that upgrader, they're comparing the differential on one product whose price is depressed in the U.S. market, namely bitumen, against another product whose price is also depressed in that same U.S. market, namely Canadian heavy oil. It's that differential within the same saturated market that is driving the economics of their project.
If there was a different policy framework where we had a concerted strategy to use our own resources first to meet our own needs, then as part of a strategy to get western oil to eastern Canada, you could look at a different scenario entirely, because now you'd be comparing the price of bitumen versus the comparator price in eastern Canada, which is something very different. It's not the depressed western Canada select price; it's the world price, adjusted for the quality of the fuel, etc.
Again, to reinforce Mr. Wilson's point about the need for this to be within the context of a policy that commits us to a Canadian energy strategy, and value-added within that strategy, an east-west outlet for the production could change the economics of the project itself.