I don't know if market diversification per se would bring the maximum benefit. I wouldn't diversify just for the sake of diversification. I think the maximum benefit to aboriginals is the same as the maximum benefit to all Canadians, which is extracting the most value from this product. That may not necessarily involve diversification.
I'm glad you mentioned this paper by Ken and Brian because in fact they'll be launching a major paper and project on aboriginals and natural resource development next Thursday. Ken will be in town and actually speaking to the Ottawa Economics Association. I think their basic thesis is that aboriginals have not always been properly included a lot of times particularly historically in the 20th century. We would move in, set up camps, take the resources out, and sayonara. Not enough was done to involve aboriginals in the development, in making sure that they would be equal participants. I think that's very much what Ken's and Brian's message is: to include aboriginals.
I think there has certainly been progress. Look at the unemployment rates, for example. When I look at the breakdown of unemployment, there are two groups that stand out as having double-digit unemployment in our society today. One is teenagers ages 15 to 19, and the other is recent immigrants who have been here less than five years. I was kind of expecting aboriginals to be in that group, but actually their unemployment rate is down to something like 8.8%, so all that development going on in the west, because of the shortages there, I think there has been an inducement for companies to train and develop aboriginals.