Depending on which of the one or two of the projects are feasible and get to the table first, the others will be left out.
The other explanation we heard is that energy contracts, as an example, tend to be very long term because of the infrastructure cost. Therefore, the seller and the purchaser are going to make long-term agreements, which doesn't necessarily lend itself to inviting alternative energy sources or creative energy solutions.
How would you characterize that? We're seeing a bit of an energy race in that market right now, to try to be the first viable option on the table.