Thank you.
The degree to which the resolution is sufficient is really one that comes from our experience in providing regional or framework scale maps, as we call them, across the north and in the southern parts of the country.
Our experience has shown that preliminary maps, where direct observations were made every several kilometres or tens of kilometres, will guide us to the basic building blocks. For industry to step up, they need to be able to test hypotheses without leaving their offices. Each type of mineral deposit or energy deposit has its own recipe, if you will. If they can't see the building blocks of the recipe in existing public maps, it's difficult for them to make a business case to go there to explore.
Our experience has shown that we need to provide direct data and direct observations every kilometre, every half a kilometre, or every few hundreds of metres. It allows us to illustrate the geology in sufficient detail for private sector explorers to put a hypothesis together that's backed by a business case that investors will fund for them to go to a basically unexplored area with sufficient resolution to test a specific hypothesis about a shear zone-hosted gold deposit or a particular type of zinc deposit. It's based on our experience.
I suspect your geology professor was correct. You can always go back to look and add more detail. Our maps are interpretations. They're not absolute fact. You can go back and zoom in forever. We have to draw the line at a particular scale. It's the threshold where industry can step up and make private sector investments in development.