The use of corridors has been looked at many times, and continues to be. At this point, in terms of specifically electricity, we haven't been speaking directly with our counterparts at the association level, although I just met with Jim Burpee earlier this week on another matter.
Corridors are frequently used. For example, in Calgary right now ATCO gas pipelines is attempting to move its main trunk lines to affiliate with the rings designed for exactly that purpose. They can be very helpful, as one of the other witnesses described, in confirming an overall agreement in terms of land use and good front-end consultation that's not about one project but about an objective of public infrastructure—in our case using private capital, but nonetheless fundamentally about public interest.
Where you want to be careful is that sometimes trying to pre-guess all destinies in terms of infrastructure location can be challenging, and sometimes one single corridor is a good idea. Other times, actually utilizing a couple of different corridors for different purposes, or for different geotech interests, works a little bit better.
So there's great value in it. We've been active in policy conversations about that in the past, and look forward to continuing to see innovative ideas come forward.