I don't have the specifics on that. It would be best to direct that to the company or the regulator. But I will say that there is a wide range of judgment used in management systems, which is a part of the law. There are many parts of standards that set an absolute minimum, and other parts that are there as guidance.
We are assessing that ruling from the NEB, as an industry, because it's fundamentally important that we meet any and all expectations.
We will continue to look at a risk-based approach that escalates beyond standards. An incremental small clause that may have not been clear—that is my understanding of part of the controversy over this—does not mean that there has been a non-compliance. There may be further discussions to be had on that specific case. I can tell you unequivocally that the combination of those world-class standards, the CSA standards coupled with risk-based management systems that push above and beyond those, are encompassed in the NEB regulations, and in company practice and third-party audits.