This question is for Mr. Telford, and then maybe again if you have time, Mr. Lavoie, you could answer part of this.
It builds a little on what Mr. Garneau was saying about the community colleges. Budget 2013 invested a line item in the Centre for Northern Innovation in Mining in my riding in the Yukon Territory. It's been really focused on this trades and technical facility to graduate people in very specific jobs in trades and training. You made a point about apprentices and journeymen, and they're looking at evolving that into being able to come up with a real creative way of deploying the work force so there isn't that constant and continuous burden on the employer to always have somebody in a training position with them, and spread that out a bit over various fields. It's pretty creative and neat.
Through a diversification lens, how important are those kinds of investments that the federal government makes in community colleges, like the one in the Yukon, to deal with skilled labour market shortages? Two, what is the tipping point for us in terms of our diversifying the market to the extent that, with every market expansion and every web we cast out there to diversify the products we deliver, we would also have to do the same in terms of diversifying the work force, which is already under a fair bit of stress and strain?
Do you have any comments about whether we should narrow that focus in diversification to achieve workers, or are we okay to broaden it, but at the same time we need to broaden that labour market?