We've had a fair bit of testimony on this, and I just want to commend all three of you. I'm finding your testimony invaluable. I really appreciate it. In many ways, it's unfortunate that we couldn't have heard your testimony before the legislation was tabled.
On that theme, following up on my colleague's comments across the way, most federal environmental legislation now includes a provision that calls for a five-year review. That's being implemented because, like occupational health and safety, environment evolves over time with R and D. It puts pressure on the regulator to monitor whether things are effective. Generally speaking, they've been open reviews so that all interested parties can participate.
Presuming that all the parties to this legislation would be supportive, would the three of you support an amendment to this bill to require that the government have a five-year review and that there be a report to Parliament, a review that would engage all interested parties?