Yes, quickly.
My answer will be a bit strange to you, but if you believe, like me, that overall hydrocarbons have created more benefits than problems, then I always have a problem with people who give themselves the right to block what I see as progress. What is the social licence to block development? What is the social licence to block economic well-being? What is the social licence that gives you the right to prevent reforesting the planet by developing fossil fuels further? What is the social licence to always focus on one problem by overlooking all the other benefits?
I think governments need to strike a balance between progress and problems. Yes, you might argue that.... I'm not going to address the scope of the study that is reviewed here, but I think that this whole discourse around social licence is too one-sided for my taste.