Yes. I would say first of all that we have to be careful here between the political question of dealing with the political situation and dealing with promising help from an industry on a commercial basis. I think there is a risk that we can over-promise if we start converting political statements of solidarity into a commitment that we're actually going to deliver gas.
In terms of what others are doing, I think there is a debate in the U.S. that is still ongoing. We've seen some initial approval of gas exports, but there is that debate between balancing the needs of the owners of the resource—the gas—and the interest of how to best serve the American economy. I'm not sure that it's entirely resolved. At the end of the day, I don't think we're actually going to see a wide opening of U.S. gas exports. I think there is risk in that.
Also, between shale gas and energy efficiency, for instance, Europe has a lot of this to deal with in its own hands. They can probably reduce nearly 50% of what Russia sends into Europe through either alternate means or the other suggestions that I made earlier—