There may be several questions packed in there.
Obviously, I think the best way to start, Mr. Chair, is to give a specific example of how, perhaps, this is being done differently. It fits with an energy strategy, at least in terms of approach. Pipeline safety, as you may or may not know, has been one of the topics over the past couple of weeks in my 10-week tenure as the Minister of Natural Resources where we hope we're sending a clear signal of the importance of a strategy that looks at prevention, preparedness and readiness and, obviously, at the liability and compensation regime that's in place.
It has been consistent with our approach to nuclear energy. It has been consistent with our approach in other government departments, where the approach to energy overall is substantially and substantively implicated, and I'm talking about marine safety.
My exercises, in the past few weeks in particular, have been focused on community engagement, policies and tools, for example for the National Energy Board, to focus on enforcement, and for communities to be involved in the safety aspects of, for example, pipeline safety.
This has been very well received by stakeholders, by community leaders, and I think it is a really good example of where our government, moving forward, understands the context of energy development, energy infrastructure, energy transportation. When it's well understood in the context of community level participation, and subsequent to that, in community level activities that focus on safety, specifically prevention, preparedness, and readiness--I'm speaking primarily of land-based, because that's what fits within Natural Resources--and, of course, a liability regime.... Those kind of exercises and investments, if you will, go a long way to creating more confidence and more education and understanding about a national energy strategy.