I think our view of it and our analysis of it would suggest that we're world-class in terms of being.... We have a strong regulatory environment, a strong legal framework, a strong regulator who's independent, a record that has not seen any significant incidents of large proportions, and a record that demonstrates that the companies have operated consistently, safely, and with concern for the environment and the development, one that's brought benefits to the country.
There was an assessment done by a consulting firm for the Gulf of Mexico in the wake of the Gulf of Mexico spill that established essentially the degree to which the regulatory system was extensive, the degree to which it made its decisions, and the speed at which those decisions were made. In this particular account, Canada, the U.K., and Norway had kind of all clustered together as being quite extensive, having significant decision-making, but taking the time to make the decisions. One of the findings in the United States example had been the speed at which the decisions were made. If the regulator doesn't respond within a certain period of time, it is deemed approved.
There was a view that, while it took time in Canada to do things, we did things right and we looked extensively at things. The record has, I think generally speaking, been quite significant in terms of demonstrating that.