I'll address this broadly, and then turn to my colleagues.
Broadly, joining the international convention provides us more protection in the sense that there's a community of countries that have similar circumstances and basically have the same frameworks. So it provides legal certainty.
More specifically, the United States is a signatory to that convention, one of the charter signatories. Today it's fair to say that both Canada and the United States have nuclear facilities. Many of those are near the border. There is the potential—albeit, as we think or believe, pretty remote—that an incident could be transboundary.
Absent being a member of the convention, there is no treaty, no workable framework with the United States on how to deal with something that might originate in either country and impact the other. Joining the convention, and the convention coming into force, will allow us to have a treaty with the United States that deals with certainty of jurisdiction, certainty on how to deal with damages, and certainty on how to deal with what kinds of issues might arise.
I could certainly turn to Dave first, perhaps, and then Joanne next, to add to your question in terms of what other benefits would come.