I suggest it would be both. I think Canadians in general are committed to the view that operators of industrial activities with an element of risk associated with them ought to be prepared for incidents and accidents, through the design and the operations of their industrial activity, their emergency plans, and all the prep they do in the event something happens, and then the work they do to prevent it.
At the same time from a government perspective, there needs to be an assurance that the operators of these facilities have the resources and are able to deal with them from a financial point of view. And then there needs to be a regulatory system that requires them to have the plans, to exercise the plans, to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the regulator who's independent of government that they're prepared, that they've done everything they can to mitigate and prevent things. Most Canadians are not fully aware of the number of dollars involved, but I think their expectations are pretty straightforward. They expect people to be ready, to take every action possible to avoid things, and to be prepared to deal with incidents should they ever arise.