Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you to our guests today.
Mr. Binder, you indicated early on in your statement to the committee that you'll not license a facility unless you're convinced it's safe. Then you went on to talk a bit about your regulatory framework and some of the testing you've done. Can you comment on the current sites that exist in Canada in terms of their location, and contrast that with the Fukushima site? I mean, we can construct but we can't control acts of nature. I think what I've heard from the testimony is that there is low probability, but I think we all recognize that there's high consequences, of any sort of disaster. So the probability of an incident based on what you put in place seems low, but, of course, we know that the consequences are high.
What kind of assessment is done in the Canadian context for location? What sort of contribution, in terms of location, did the Fukushima disaster have on that incident?