Through you, Chair, to the officials, it would seem to me that the proposed amendment by my colleague Mr. Regan would actually limit the definition and basically take away, in some aspect, the expertise of the Nuclear Safety Commission, which is responsible for those designations through regulation, through clause 7. Am I not reading that correctly?
If there were something that would be brought to bear, such as a new technology or whatever the case might be, we would want the Nuclear Safety Commission to make that determination as to what is a nuclear installation through a more nimble process, such as a regulatory process, rather than requiring a legislative change.