Mr. Chairman, to achieve what you're trying to achieve here, it seems to me that what you ought to be saying is those funds are to be used to compensate for the damage that is suffered if (a), (b), or (c) occurs, because without that it simply says those funds are to be used to compensate for the damage that is suffered if (a) occurs in the territory of a contracting state, or (b) occurs, or (c) occurs.
You've gone right down, and you know what you've done in terms of replacing lines 30 to 32, so unless you add the comment “if it” at the end of what you've got here in the proposed amendment, I don't see how this works with (a), (b), and (c).
Am I wrong? I certainly was last time, so....