Perhaps I could start.
The amendment calls for the ability to create regulations that would allow for, I guess, determining the nature and approach to calculating non-use value. In the context of the policy direction of the bill, the policy direction of the bill indicates, of course, that non-use value will be recognized. It's recognized in several parts of the bill, and allows for governments, whether they be provincial or federal, to proceed to put forward claims for non-use value. It then would allow the courts to determine the nature and specifics around each case that would allow there to be an evidentiary and values-based discussion and a court-based discussion as to what those values are, how they might be calculated, and what's most appropriate in the circumstances.
The regulation-making authority, of course, would allow for government to consider how that would happen in advance, a priori. I think the policy direction of the bill proposes that it be something to be examined when it's appropriate to examine it.