Through you, Mr. Chair, we're not talking about a criminal action, we're talking about a civil action in damages against somebody who through their gross negligence causes damage to a nuclear installation.
My question remains, why would we deny the right of the operator of the facility of seeking recourse against a party who, through their gross negligence, causes damage to the nuclear installation? Is this prohibited in the convention, or is this just something the government has decided? It is really limiting civil liability.