Okay. I get how the different categories would then help the companies, and the companies aren't going to want to be shaken down. Also, I understand why you might want a $100,000 threshold, because you'd have too much paperwork for the problem. But how does one, then, get at—how should we put this?—the petty corruption? If, instead of paying off the top guy a million bucks a year I'm then going to pay off a lot of small guys $50,000 to $75,000 a year, I slide right under that threshold. Are we just moving it down to a different level rather than dealing with it?
On November 18th, 2014. See this statement in context.