I think you're getting right to the heart of my question. I am profoundly worried that in an industry like the nuclear industry it is in our best interest to attract the best and the brightest and obviously one of the tools we have for doing that is our compensation package. Pensions are a key part of that compensation package.
I'm wondering why your approach to the pension issue was not to keep all employees on a par in the three-year transition period, not to have them all in the same pension plan, which would obviously have an impact on negotiations down the road as well. You're creating one pension plan for all employees and they would all be in the same position as they negotiated the pension plan after the three-year transition period. I wonder if you could just speak to the rationale for not including new hires in the same plan.