I was just confused about it being $100,000 or more generally and not $100,000 or more in some categories. Fair enough.
You mentioned there are strict liability offences and that “you shall not try to get around the rules”. Also, as you mentioned, there'd be different investigative means and mechanisms if there was evidence that somebody was trying to get around those payment rules. It draws back to the $100,000 category. I know you've talked about parity with other nations to make sure Canada is on an equal playing field and we have that consistency, which makes a lot of sense. Do we know the rationale around the $100,000? It would seem to me that in some locations $100,000, or just under that, could seem like a pretty significant payment, and in other areas it might not be that significant.
During Mr. Cameron's chairmanship, did they indicate how they initially came up with that $100,000?