I'll start that off and maybe pass it to Terence afterwards.
The original analysis leading up to the creation of the major projects management office and the initiative analyzed a number of major resource projects that had taken place to date and concluded that the average time for the regulatory review was up to four years. That included the environmental assessment and the regulatory permitting. One of the overall objectives of the initiative was to cut that time in half while in no way compromising environmental protection measures and effectiveness of the review.
If you average the amount of federal time taken on the 17 reviews we have completed, we have met the target of two years or less.
Another element in terms of success though is not just efficiency; it is effectiveness, and we have some information on that now. We are embarking on that in a more concerted effort now to get effectiveness performance measures nailed down so we can be able to comment on how effective the review processes have been in this next round of evaluation of the initiative and potential renewal.