From the proponent's perspective at present there was flawed data. That's the information the proponent has submitted.
The issue right now is that the panel process is essentially completed. There were public hearings, and there was ample opportunity for all participants to put their information on the record and to question each other. The panel completed the hearings, wrote its report, and then submitted its report.
This recent information from the proponent is after the hearings were completed and the panel's report was issued. Now it's actually a matter for the Minister of the Environment to determine what the next step is, if there's any next step, with respect to this information, given that it was submitted after the hearings had concluded and after the panel issued its report. It's inappropriate for me to comment on the merits of the proponent's comments post-hearings.