I can't point to a specific example in New Brunswick right now in which that has occurred. I know that there's every effort for coordination. If there isn't a substituted or equivalency agreement in place and there is a provincial requirement and a federal requirement, the overall objective, and this is often driven by the Environmental Assessment Agency, is to coordinate to the maximum extent possible to make sure that one set of information is meeting the requirements of both jurisdictions and that they go along a parallel track and they are integrated when they can be, so that there is a coordinated assessment.
As to your concern about the uptake of substitution, there is one thing we're trying to do. We have a regulatory reform working group under the Energy and Mines Ministers' Conference which the MPMO was involved in. We work on a number of deliverables every year. One this year will be to share experiences on substitution. We'll ask British Columbia to share their experience on substitution, how it's going, how they got there, so that other provinces such as New Brunswick can learn from it, and so there might be more appetite to facilitate other provinces taking up a substituted approach.