Again, it's very difficult to draw precise comparisons across different regimes and different jurisdictions, given that they all operate under a different context, different legislation, different regimes, and they have their own processes and approaches in place. We're quite confident that the process we have in Canada is substantive in terms of its rigour and thoroughness and the ability to provide that certainty and clarity for industry proponents. We've been the office, and the initiative has been identified as a best practice by industry stakeholders and by different levels of government.
We've had a number of conversations with counterparts in the U.S., a number of conversations with delegations from Australia, and a number of conversations with business leaders across North America. They have pointed to the reforms we've made as a best model of best practices that their jurisdictions should look at in terms of replicating, to try to ensure that they continue to remain competitive with Canada as we go forward.
I'm not saying that our job is done. We can always get better. We continue to hear about areas where significant improvements can be made, so we continue to focus on our opportunities and where we can get better. We need to continue to move, because the bar continues to move. That's one thing we're certain of: the opportunity is to always get better.