Yes. Specifically, the increase of $6.5 million is primarily due to its review of TransCanada's Energy East pipeline and Imperial's deepwater offshore well applications. I think I mentioned at least one or maybe both.
Because safety and environmental protection go to the core of what the National Energy Board's priorities are, this is about providing safety information and, equally important, compliance and enforcement actions, which again is why I may have taken some exception to a previous question that I think may have overlooked the new tools that the National Energy Board has for compliance and enforcement—in some instances, the doubling of fines.
Of course, I will never miss an opportunity to talk about the important work the National Energy Board does in its full-scale review of a given project. Its success is manifested in the fact that there are at least 72,000 kilometres of federally regulated pipeline, for which Canada has a 99.999% safety record.
We believe that in the exercise of building public confidence, our responsibility, whether it's pipeline safety or a pipeline regime legislative framework, should focus on safety, prevention, preparedness, and response. Of course, a world-class—if not world-leading—liability regime is an important part of giving Canadians the confidence that these pipeline projects should proceed. We know, at least here in North America, that a majority of folks appear to understand and support that.