What I can say is we're very engaged in that. We're very engaged because, aside from our own issues, it's a big trade concern. As folks are making pellets and selling them into the European Union, the European Union is demanding that they come from sustainably sourced areas, etc. But you have a range of practices. If you go to Scandinavia, they actually go as far as ripping the trunks out of the ground. They have a complete 100% use of biomass. We're the complete opposite. In fact, our scientists believe that we can definitely use more biomass than we do. We have a number of science projects working right across the country—some of the experts at the Laurentian Forestry Centre in Quebec City are working with Laval University, etc., and we have some going on at Petawawa as well—to do long-term studies about how much more can you take out. How much more of the tree can you take out of the forest, while still leaving the nutrient base acceptable or reasonable for future regeneration of the forest? There's not a quick answer to that, because obviously you kind of look at some regeneration, but for certain, our scientists are showing that we can take out more than we have been.
On January 29th, 2015. See this statement in context.