Thanks for that.
In terms of incentivizing work on that front, I know there's so much provincial-territorial responsibility with developing these co-partners with industry, but rural Canada...and I would think it's probably a provincial policy right across the board, but I'll talk about Yukon and see if it does deploy across Canada.
In remote communities where forest fires happen—the Northwest Territories just had one heck of a summer for fires—a lot of firefighting policy is that if it's not threatening roadway and access and personal property, we just let it burn. Of course forest fires are a natural cycle of restoration and regrowth. They're an important contributor to environmental habitat regeneration, but at some point it seems there's a fine line between natural recycling and then just a complete waste of a good forest product.
Is there any sort of modelling or mapping that's possible to do to trigger Canadian locations that are flashpoint hot spots or more susceptible to fires so that we could sort of cherry-pick, for lack of a better word, to have an appropriate level of recycling in the burn cycle itself but also utilization of good forest products before they go up in smoke?