I think from a value perspective tissue is a very good example; it's a tangible example, today's example. In the future, bio-fuel, bio-something. There's a lot of money being spent and there's a lot of research being done on it, but nothing has really come up on a commercial scale yet. Where is that going? I don't know. It should take us someplace positive, but there are lots of places around. Bio is based on fibre, and certain characteristics of fibre. There is lots of fibre in Brazil or Indonesia or the southern U.S. or other jurisdictions, too, where they have cheap, low-cost fibre, and they can convert it to bio-something.
I think it's good. We should support it, but we can't live in hope. People have to be employed today and we have to build our tax base today. Over time—and I think this is very important for Canada—if we look after our forests, they're a great asset. We tell the Province of New Brunswick, listen, you have crown land. That's a privilege, not a right. That's a privilege to have a piece of crown land. You should enforce good management of it. The company may come and the company may go. They might go bankrupt or they might stay for a hundred years, but if we look after the land, the province and the country, if it's universal in Canada, we'll have a great asset. We'll have trees growing. We'll have carbon sequestration. We'll have fish and wildlife. We'll have hunting, and we'll have value-added manufacturing operations. We'll have small, rural communities that will be able to sustain themselves. Those are all things that go with good management. But we have to start with managing the land with a vision of where we want to go.