Thank you very much.
It may be that other witnesses, as I ask them other questions, may want to add to or respond to that.
Mr. Olszynski, I think you were saying that instead of using the phrase “non-use damages”, we should be using the phrase “environmental damages”. Is that defined elsewhere in legislation?
I'm trying to get my head around this. Is it possible that “non-use damages” could be a broader phrase than “environmental damages”.