I think again it goes back to our evaluations where we talk to the users of the program, other experts who are out there, and ask, “Given what we have in Canada now, and given whatever is the appropriate split between public science and private science, how are we doing, how are people finding the program, do they think it's helpful?“ One of the questions on the evaluation would be, “Are you using the information that's coming out of the program?” We use that, in addition to a number of other things, to tell us whether we should enhance this program, take it down, or put more emphasis over on the other side.
It really is a question of our own analytics. We try to figure out where the biggest bang for the buck is, but we also talk to people who know about it on the outside, and the people who use these programs to see if they think we have the balance right. At the end of the day, I don't think there's any precise right answer we can pinpoint, but we use it to guide us as we take policy decisions about where we put each additional dollar. That's really the process that we follow when we try to be as rigorous as we can about it.