I'll ask this again.
We talked about the green technologies. This is from the perspective of a northeastern British Columbian who deals with opposition to developing resources without the full understanding that if we don't develop them it will completely come to a stop. And that means any kinds of gains, such as you're talking about with being more efficient by using fewer elements to make a certain technology. There isn't necessarily an understanding; it will take some time to get there, but we need to keep going to get there.
Can you clarify for the committee—and this is getting close to an opinion—that developing technologies is still a positive step, and green technologies, or we simply couldn't develop them?
Could you speak to that a bit?