Okay, thank you.
It's of interest that the minister is claiming that the department's outcomes are all based on what is called responsible development. He seems to be equating that with sustainable development. The strategic outcomes in plans and priorities for 2011-12 specified dollars for clean energy. Interestingly, that outcome was related to cumulative greenhouse gas reductions.
In other words, that means over time and for the last two years, including this one, we see nothing whatsoever in place, any kind of dedicated resources toward clean energy. Can you explain how you can then claim to be pursuing an agenda of responsible development, sustainable development, and assigning zero dollars to clean energy?