Thank you.
I appreciated your comments when you said that the chief safety officer can shut down something if there's a dangerous operation. My experience on construction projects was always that way, even though the safety officer reported to the project manager who was on any specific site. Essentially, they had a tremendous amount of power. If there was a danger out there, they could actually shut the installation down. I'm glad you said that, because that can happen here.
This bill also clarifies that role. As you pointed out in your comments, it can't be the CEO and it can't be any other officer. It has to be a stand-alone officer. That increases the transparency.
How would the person be selected, and roughly how long would a person serve?