I think we all feel that's appropriate.
Let me go back to recommendation 29 from your report. My colleague Mr. Harris has mentioned the issue of cost in terms of more helicopters, a 30-minute run-dry capability and so forth. One of the things we heard from the government and the C-NLOPB as a reason for not having a separate authority in relation to safety was that the expertise was within the board.
My question is really two-part. First, do you think that's a sufficient reason for not separating and having a separate authority? And two, in relation to this question of cost, what are the kinds of influences that you would see possibly being in conflict within the board and that I presume would have given risen to your recommendation to begin with?