I'm sorry if my presentation didn't highlight that. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has a clear role in regulating pest entry and taking on the responsibilities associated with eradication for a pest like Asian long-horned beetle. When it comes to management of the problem, there is not a clear role across the different land types based on ownership. That management falls to the land owner.
I think that the federal government could be helping to form some of the collaborative groups—the science committees, so to speak—for each of the different types of pests that are potentially going to enter and cause such significant damage.
As I said, in Toronto, the emerald ash borer was a $70-million problem for us to manage. As Canadians, we've lost an incredible part of our forest. Oak wilt is on the border of Canada. We have great concerns about what kind of impact that is going to have when it comes to Toronto, and Ontario as a whole. We feel there could be a committee struck now to help inform some of the things that we should be doing to stop it from coming into the country or to stop it from spreading. I mentioned things like pruning restrictions. Maybe those should be regulated, or maybe there needs to be more education for the public or for the industry to understand the danger associated with pruning an oak in the summer period when beetles are around and are at risk of infecting other trees.
I feel there could be more effort put into developing the management objectives that will help to reduce the spread, as well as simply the regulatory objectives that we have in place to try to stop the entry into the country.
I also mentioned the importance of Canadian scientists in helping to predict some of the changes and helping to develop tools like the biological pesticides that we currently use. TreeAzin is one that they helped develop. Other things like drones, as I mentioned, would be a lot cheaper than bringing [Technical difficulty—Editor] and spray an area.
Jozef, can you say the area in Toronto that we're...?