There you go.
However, I want to draw on the point you made that one thing government could do would be to encourage Canadians to value their trees more and to get out of that environment where you don't get to experience them. The truth is, to do that, most of us have to get out of where we live and go somewhere else.
It's a known fact that in Canada there are at least four times as many camping units as there are opportunities to camp. It is an issue for people to be able to get out to enjoy that. It's important for Canadian families, and it's also important for the tourist industry. My concern is that lately when it comes to private SMEs, smaller campgrounds in Canada, the government decided to redesignate them as passive income, which increased the taxes to the place to where, as I've heard from small campground owners in Ontario and in Saskatchewan, they can no longer stay in business.
When you look at a whole-of-government approach to making sure that the environment is valued and that the outdoors are valued, is this something that would be a concern? It's an oxymoron, in a way. We want to keep things pristine, yet the majority of Canadians also need that opportunity to experience it.