It's certainly true that the provinces have a lot of the power—pardon the pun on this—to deliver these types of programs, and sometimes there is a some boom-and-bust experience for a lot of the service providers because it's based on some policy.
There are things the federal government can do and there are two of them that have been successful. One is the minimum energy performance standard, which is setting the highest standards for appliances such as windows and hot water tanks and heat pumps so that wherever they are sold in Canada, they are the best in class. That's number one. Number two is on industrial energy efficiency. No matter which province an industry is in, you can fund programs for that, and those have been quite successful.
One of the things that we're advocating for is a policy that helps to smooth out that boom and bust when provincial politics could hinder these types of programs. The way we're asking for it is not essentially just to transfer money to do energy efficiency, but to transfer money around programs that transform markets and eventually get us to the building codes and things that are strong. Mr. Lee was talking about a timely manner in installing these codes. We're advocating for a similar type of initiative whereby funds could be provided to various actors and provinces that can demonstrate that the work they're doing is getting us to the place where we have energy efficiency baked into the codes. That's what we're asking.