It's important to understand that there's a lot to that program. There's a lot of architecture to bring in—no pun intended—and there are a lot of people you need to train. Once you set up a program like that, it's a heavy lift and it needs a commitment. If the government were to consider bringing back that program, I think we would want to look carefully at how to do it in a way that is cost-effective and is perhaps a bit more targeted. I think that bringing back the same program might not be the best approach. I think the learning from the last one and the million homes that were upgraded would be an important first step.
Another thought, perhaps, is for something in the commercial building space. My colleagues here would probably know more about this, but the commercial building space is really a tough nut to crack on energy efficiency. You have complex ownership structures. Targeted programs that look at the commercial building space—and maybe a commercial retrofit program that mirrors the residential one—would be something worth exploring as well.