Jim, it is really good to see you again. Thanks, both of you, for making the time. I know it has been a trying process to get you here, and I appreciate it very much. I know what your schedule is like and the work the National Energy Board has done, not just over the last few months but over the last few years, in terms of regulating our pipelines and energy sector, and I wanted to say thank you very much for the work you guys have done.
Some of the questions we have had here today so far have been about what you are not doing. I would like to focus on some of the things you are doing at the National Energy Board.
We have had many witnesses over the last few months testify that Canada has one of the strongest, if not the strongest, regulatory review processes in the world. Other countries and producers come to Canada to model their system on what we do here, and yet we were talking today about not having the respect or the buy-in, let's say, from provincial and national governments and politicians. I like one of the answers you gave. You don't see shortcomings in the review process and assessment reporting you are doing.
Is there anything we can do that we are not doing now that you feel will all of a sudden change the narrative so that some of the opponents to our national pipeline programs will all of a sudden change their mind? Are there things we are not doing that we could be doing?