Okay, thank you.
I listened with interest as you talked about the environmental concerns raised, and about the well-funded environmentalist as something you're going to have to deal with, but in fact, the process has been delayed because the information has not been provided. That's a little different and it's a little bit not correct for you to say that it's a long drawn-out process, that we shouldn't have it. If a project is going to move forward, then all the information should be brought forward. It should be analyzed and then approved. In this case, there has been additional information requested, with a three-month extension added on because they need more detail on a suspension bridge and a pier. It concerns me that you want to give the impression that you want to rush headlong without really studying the impact it would have on salmon and on the environment.
I want to ask a couple of questions, though. I want to know who is financing your organization. Is that something for which you raise money personally? Do you have companies behind you? Are you registered anywhere? Are you registered, in fact, as a lobbyist here?