That's a tricky one.
The report that you mentioned said that there is no best way to do it. There needs to be some flexibility, depending on the local environment and the local economy, in terms of the best way to incent GHG reductions, which is what everybody wants to do in the end. It's just a question of the pathway there. I think what this paper is saying is that there are multiple pathways to the end goal, not just one.
As an industry, particularly with potash and uranium, we are not able to pass on to the markets any carbon taxes that we might be incurring. It's just not possible, so we need some protection of trade-exposed sectors, like we have with Saskatchewan. That's something that we're very cognizant of and something our premier is very cognizant of as well, because, of course, oil is another one of our big exports. That's another one where we have to take the global price. We can't pass on the cost of carbon taxes. That's the big sensitivity.